One of the core tenets of TRP, as I understand it is the sexual plurality of women referred to as «alpha fucks, beta bucks». Or in modern society, perhaps, to a larger degree, «alpha fucks, beta validation».
My hypothesis is simply this: Women are more atuned to noticing who is the leader in a social group.
Furthermore, they are more atuned to notice who is the most dominant in a social interaction.
The evo-psych reasoning being that women that have been more atuned to choosing alphas have breed children who have bred more children.
Ie. being able to detect the most alpha of a group is a reproductive advantage.
Now, if this is true. The corollary might also explain the clueless of guys.
Men, I suggest, may be less adept at noticing social hierarchy and who is more dominant/alpha in an interaction (includes 1-on-1).
That is why men often get taken for ride, ie exploited for validation and material goods. Furthermore, feminism has excarbated this tendency(ie women are even more focused on alphas/men are even less dominant in all manners, economically, behaviorally etc).
Anyway I also noticed that seemingly innocent (even jokes), to my eye, by peers or friends will have a really negative effect on women.
Furthermore, this why showing any desire for a woman vs putting yourself in a lower/too low for her standards is a fine line.
Even very innocuous comments or actions, might switch women from interested to dismissive.
However, one can ask, why have not men being equipped with such social intelligence or atleast not as strong as women ?
Is that not a reproductive disadvantage ?
Might be, but women & men differ and excel in different areas related to survival and human society. So it might just be, that guys in general cant see this as easily and therefore need training ie. Game.
Would like to hear your thoughts.
RED PILL THERAPY 